Come test me: I never cower/ For the love of money, son, Im giving lead showers/ Jay-Z, DEvils, Reasonable Doubt, 1996. On August 11, 2004, Jay-Z became minority-owner of the New Jersey Nets. With a measly 1.47% to his name, it made no sense why more successful, majority-owners like real estate developer Bruce Ratner included Jay-Z in the dream team that acquired the Nets. Then, as with everything else, truth crushed to earth began to rise. The reason(s) why this famous Brooklynite was chosen started surfacing. Shortly after, Ratner presented his plan to relocate the Nets from East Rutherford, New Jersey, to Brooklyn, New York. And who better to use as the public face for this transaction than the Brooklyn-born Jigga man himself. (Plus, he, and only he, could help put King James in a Nets Jersey!) So, when Jay-Z took Oprah on a tour around his old neighborhood a couple months back, and some Hip-Hop observers couldnt keep from salivating over, as they saw it, how far Hip-Hop had come, a few of us were forced to admire from a distanceand with a sense of suspicion. One or two questions had to be answered, we figured: Why would Oprah want to tour Brooklyn? Whats in it for Oprah? Whats in it for Jay-Z? Who really orchestrated this event? What connection does this ostensibly spontaneous, Hallmark moment have with the ongoing public relations campaign, geared in full-throttle mode, to convince Brooklyn residents that the demolition of sacred, public property is, in fact, in their interest (!), and that protesting the ambitious, $4 billion, 8-million square feet Atlantic Yards Project (AYP) would cause more harm than good? With the recent onslaught of lawsuits filed against Forest City Ratner Companies, the developing firm at the helm of AYP (most expensive in history), its no more secret what role Jay-Z would be asked to playeven as the community pushes back harder and further on what it considers grotesque misuse of eminent domain laws, to serve the indifferent interests of capricious corporations. Among the many groups against this proposal stands Develop Dont Destroy Brooklyn (DDDB), a coalition consisting of 21 community organizations. One of the reasons DDDB is firmly against Ratners plans is that at least $1.6 million of the anticipated (though likely to be much higher) $4 billion would be plunged from the publics purse. Of the few promises made to Brooklyn residents, most important seemed to be the thousands of units in public housingto compensate those who would be modestly asked (stick-up fashion) to give up their homes for a sports complex. But, according to BrooklynSpeaks, an advocacy group wary of the proposal, two thirds of the units in the development will be sold or rented at market rate, and 60% of the affordable units would only be affordable to families making in excess of the Brooklyn median income, which is $35,000. So, rather than help assuage the crisis of affordable housing, it could actually accelerate the gentrification and displacement that is already in progress. Residents also fear that the plan, expected to include a basketball arena (Barclays Center) with 16 office and residential towers, would only bring more congestion to an already-congested town, clogging up whats left of Brooklyns arteries. The issue of public housing, however, seems to envelope all other concerns. In 2008, when Bruce Ratner revealed new designs for the Atlantic Yards Project, he again underscored the guarantee of over 2,250 affordable housing units among the total 6,400 residences at full build-out. At the time, protesters feared that given the credit crunch, increased construction costs and the downturn in the real estate market, Forest City will not retain certain key aspects of the project it has promised to deliver. That was May last year. Well, a few days ago, The Brooklyn Paper, a community journal, fully corroborated their concerns: State development officials are drafting a new deal with Bruce Ratner that will give the Atlantic Yards developer a loophole out of the projects main selling point: thousands of units of affordable housing. It revealed that new clauses were clandestinely inserted into a Sept. 17 lease proposal which frees Forest City from providing the 2,250 units of affordable housing promised. The provision essentially absolved Ratner from independently, as once agreed, including the housing plans, subjecting it, instead, to governmental authorities making available
affordable housing subsidies. As one who lives in a city where the local library board promised community members last year that the only branch the Black community could call its own was safe from any budget-balancing planscome what may!and then proceeded to close it in June this year, I understand wholeheartedly the sense of shock and betrayal Brooklyn folks are starting to feel. In response to these attempts of everyday folks lifting their voice in courageous chorus against highway robbery, ACORNs chief organizer said in a statement: We are, of course, disappointed by the delays brought about by endless litigation, [but] we remain confident that, at the end of the day, Atlantic Yards will mean thousands of new units of affordable rent regulated housing and new home ownership opportunities for working families. ACORN, which has partnered with Forest City to ensure the building of affordable living arrangements (thus barring it from saying anything negative about the project), is not the only lackey stored in Bruce Ratners basementonly to be let out when protesters, especially the Black ones, refuse to lie down, hands tied, and be molested by private firms. Rev. Al Sharpton, Roberta Flack, Jason Kidd and Vince Carter all reside in the basement. The tragic reality of unkept promises concerning provision of substitute living accommodations in matters of athletic exhibitions is nothing new. Just ask South Africans, or Vancouverians, or Chicagoans. And now: Brooklynites. On July 28, 2009, BrooklynSpeaks sent a letter to the Empire State Development Corporation (ESDC), the agency responsible for approval of property development, expressing concern that the ESDC was prepared to give AYP the go-ahead without further environmental review
that would […]